banco cabezadas
An Iowa Digital Library “data bank of endbands” has been
extended by Rodrigo Ortega to include some Mexican examples.
aic certification
I voted no because if AIC develops and assumes a certification service it should authenticate, not a status of education, but a status of practice. Accredited, graduate degree programs already authenticate a status of education. Authentication of a status of practice would test such aspects as business plan, menu of services and their ethical regulation, installed facility base, client and collection relations, contributions to the field, etc.
I also estimate that AIC has plenty to do and missions to fulfill other than certification of any kind. If AIC wants to certify something other than status of practice, it should certify the certifiers or all the formal educational programs.
passive regulation
Librarians are regulators. Just as bank regulators, zoning commissioners and election boards regulate their domains, librarians monitor and authenticate knowledge. When regulators are biased bad things happen, but even when regulators are passive there are adverse results.
Adverse effects from the Googlization of books may prove to be a result of passive regulation of knowledge by librarians. Only after all textual and visual content of books is delivered to the screen will it be realized that (1) non-proprietary library service is almost extinct, (2) access to screen delivered books is suddenly expensive and infiltrated with search omissions and bais (books in poor physical condition are not scanned), and (3) that there is no inbuilt authentication in screen books as was once enjoyed with print.
Meanwhile Googlization rewards every stake holder except libraries. Investment in library classification and preservation and underlying investment of value by paper makers, book designers printers and binders is unacknowledged. And no one appears ready, not even academics, to advocate and fund the continuing role of print as master and back-up for screen delivery.

