
seeing the wind
Jose Millan at
futuro del libro was kind to mention a posting here. It was a Harry Duncan 1982 quote from his book of essays, Doors of Perception. I have been remembering various early participants in the book making community here, none stranger than
Leif Brush and his terraInstruments. Listen to a sample.
(the Hubble image is from the ever magnificent
wood-s-lot, the home station for poetic readings and picture meditation.)
e-scriptures
“The NIV Holy Bible has been the best selling Bible translation for years. Now it will become a key resource for eBook available in the popular Microsoft Reader format. Not only can the NIV Holy Bible be read just like other eBook, it can also be used as a reference source to look up a Bible verse referred to in any other eBook. This version of the NIV in Microsoft Reader format includes additional functionality which allows a user to be reading another title, hover over a Book-Chapter-Verse reference and see the actual verse pop-up as a Dictionary entry.”
Devotional works, both scriptural and scholarly, have defined the book and its presence in print. As readers utilize screen presentation these central mongraphic genres can migrate as well as airline schedules, dictionaries and romances. The format destiny of the Bible may be of particular interest.
possible futures
“The breakthrough for me was to realize that these films didnít just describe a lost past, but might also be tracing the contours of possible futures. In other words, we could see them not simply as antiquated, but as predictive.” Rick Prelinger,
“On the Virtues of Preexisting Material: A Manifesto”,
Absent Magazine
It is curious now that the Prelinger, full text, Manifesto was the last post prior to the FotB.org going off-line almost a month ago. It is a magnificent statement by an archivist futurist situating us among our documentation. The present moment can be a mirror view.
It may be our own era’s whim to see screen reading as a future unrelated to the past. But we should be prepared if this approach eventually looks silly. What if screen and print are really a single transmission ecology that is the momentum toward a different, post-digital, book? Counterpoints of print and screen works should be observed in detail to better understand their interaction and any emergence of a new synthesis.

